4-engined bomber ID model

Found an item that you cannot identify? Post it here

Moderators: MichaelB, angelreader

4-engined bomber ID model

Postby Dakota » Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:21 am

I purchased recently this 4-engined bomber 1:72 scale aluminium ID model. Used to be black painted. The wings/engines are B-29 design and the tail looks Boeing but without tail turret. The nose section has a standard windshield with astrodome in front and a flat surface nose (plexi) cone. Is this a pre-design of the B-29? Why they made a ID model of it?
Attachments
IMG_0653.jpg
IMG_0653.jpg (25.1 KiB) Viewed 3691 times
Dakota-lover
User avatar
Dakota
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:44 pm
Location: Belgium, Europe

Re: 4-engined bomber ID model

Postby MichaelB » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:05 pm

Looks like a Tupelov Tu-70, which could explain an interest in the ID version.
Michael
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 1298
Images: 33
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:57 pm

Re: 4-engined bomber ID model

Postby Dakota » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:10 pm

Thanks Michael, checking the information on the internet it looks correct. Strange bird 8-) By the way the model is available for swap.
Dakota-lover
User avatar
Dakota
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:44 pm
Location: Belgium, Europe

Re: 4-engined bomber ID model

Postby grwebster » Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:36 pm

The history behind the Tupolev bomber and the commercial airliner version is fascinating.
From Wiki- for more details go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-4

>>>The U.S. refused to supply the Soviet Union with B-29 heavy bombers under Lend Lease, despite repeated Soviet requests.[1] However, on three occasions during 1944, individual B-29s made emergency landings in Soviet territory after bombing raids on Japanese Manchuria and Japan. In accordance with the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact, the Soviets were neutral in the Pacific War and the bombers were therefore interned and kept by the Soviets, despite American demands for their return.[2] Stalin tasked Tupolev with cloning the Superfortress and Soviet industry was to produce 20 copies of the aircraft in just two years. The three B-29s were flown to Moscow and delivered into Tupolev OKB. One B-29 was fully dismantled, down to the smallest bolt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the Tu-70 was prototype airliner based on the Tu-4
Cruver also did an ID model of the Tu-70
GR Webster
Central Florida, and France
grwebster@aol.com grwebster@me.com
User avatar
grwebster
 
Posts: 1779
Images: 6
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:11 pm
Location: Central Florida and France

Re: 4-engined bomber ID model

Postby dasimperator » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:53 pm

grwebster wrote:The history behind the Tupolev bomber and the commercial airliner version is fascinating.
From Wiki- for more details go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-4

>>>The U.S. refused to supply the Soviet Union with B-29 heavy bombers under Lend Lease, despite repeated Soviet requests.[1] However, on three occasions during 1944, individual B-29s made emergency landings in Soviet territory after bombing raids on Japanese Manchuria and Japan. In accordance with the Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact, the Soviets were neutral in the Pacific War and the bombers were therefore interned and kept by the Soviets, despite American demands for their return.[2] Stalin tasked Tupolev with cloning the Superfortress and Soviet industry was to produce 20 copies of the aircraft in just two years. The three B-29s were flown to Moscow and delivered into Tupolev OKB. One B-29 was fully dismantled, down to the smallest bolt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
the Tu-70 was prototype airliner based on the Tu-4
Cruver also did an ID model of the Tu-70


The History Channel did a show about those Russkie cloneskis. It seems they even copied a repair patch to the hull of one of the ships in order to comply with the 'exact clone' mandate.
User avatar
dasimperator
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:25 pm

Re: 4-engined bomber ID model

Postby slufstuff » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:09 am

There were several extraneous holes in the Russian copy. One row of rivets on the wing had a hole drilled off center, and was left unrivetted. The Soviets included the hole in their copy.

This is not the only example of copied misunderstood features. The Mig-23 inlet design was directly copied from the F-4 Phantom. It was so closely copied, that it included the triangular extensions at the top and bottom of the inlet. The only reason those were there on the F-4 was to prevent an aircraft carrier barrier net from fouling the cockpit canopy, potentially trapping the pilot in an emergency landing. The Soviets dutifully copied them, figuring that if McDonnell Douglas put them there, it had to be for a good reason. :lol:
User avatar
slufstuff
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:54 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA


Return to Unidentified Models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron